The Moneyist: My brother-in-law is being respected by a charity, though tickets for a rite cost $375. Shouldn’t he offer to compensate for my ticket?

Dear Quentin,

My brother-in-law is being respected by an classification that provides medical assistance to children of families who can’t means their treatments. we was enclosed on a email invitation, and a sheet cost is $375 per person. we feel that it is astray to ask an particular to catch such an expense. 

I feel vigour to attend from my brother-in-law and his wife. My brother-in-law is on a organization’s house and was partial of a group that set a sheet pricing. While it competence be OK for a business, it’s an unreasonable cost for an particular — namely me. Should we compensate a cost of acknowledgment or tell him it’s too pricey and send my regrets? 

Feeling Squeezed

Dear Squeezed,

If he wants we to attend badly enough, he would present we a sheet — along with an invitation.

Take out dual sets of scales, and import a following considerations: (1) a significance of this eventuality in your brother-in-law’s life, (2) your attribute with him, (3) either we can means to spend $375 on a sheet for one night — to put that in context, we competence spend $335 for one sheet to see “Hamilton” on Broadway — and (4) a believe that a income is going toward a good means (although it does not validate as a taxation write-off in a entirety).

Friendship can get expensive. And even a extended family can cost us a flattering penny. That includes things like spending $5,000 on a end wedding, attending a friend’s child’s communion or bar mitzvah or propagandize play, or forking out $400 on a bachelorette party. We do these things since 99% of life is about display up. It’s mostly easier to contend yes, and we’re customarily blissful we did. We see a fun on a desired ones’ faces, and we feel good for creation a effort.

‘Real friendships leave space for mistakes, a peculiar ill-judged criticism and, yes, not display adult for someone’s large night since a sheet costs $375.’

But — we substantially saw that entrance — a bottom line is that no one should be forced to do anything. If it was an comprehensive prerequisite for we to be there, your brother-in-law could buy your sheet and entice we as his guest. Sure, he’s your brother-in-law and it’s a large night for him, yet it’s substantially adequate that his evident family is there to hearten him on. we don’t consider he needs extended family to make adult a numbers, quite during that price. 

Every attribute has a possess set of parameters, and family invitations can come with baggage. (Exhibit A: “He’s always been sceptical of you. This is a acknowledgment we need!”) But if that were a box here, we substantially would have mentioned it in your letter, and it would be one some-more reason to send your regrets. Real friendships leave space for mistakes, a peculiar ill-judged criticism and, yes, not display adult for someone’s large night since a sheet costs $375.

Don’t put a cost tab on a invitation, even if we are promulgation your regrets essentially since it costs $375 (and another $375 if we motionless to move a plus-one). You could horde your brother-in-law for drinks during a after date and make a bitch about his achievement. But we are not obliged. Send your brother-in-law a label and a garland of flowers on a night of a eventuality to honour him and let him know how unapproachable we are of him. 

“Real friendships leave space for mistakes, a peculiar ill-judged criticism and, yes, not display adult for someone’s large night since a sheet costs $375.”

MarketWatch illustration

Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we demeanour for answers to life’s thorniest income issues. Readers write to me with all sorts of dilemmas. 

By emailing your questions, we determine to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch. By submitting your story to Dow Jones Co., a publisher of MarketWatch, we know and determine that we competence use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including around third parties.

The Moneyist regrets he can't respond to questions individually.

More from Quentin Fottrell:

‘When we ran it past a missus, she went ballistic’: we wish to buy a $40,000 car, yet my mother pronounced no. Then things unequivocally got weird.

‘I feel used’: My partner stays with me 5 nights a week, even yet he owns his possess home. Should he compensate for utilities and food? 

‘Poor people are not stupid’: we grew adult in poverty, warranted $14 an hour, and hereditary $150,000. Here’s what we have schooled from my windfall.

This entry was posted in Featured Articles and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.